Custom software development for the workflows your business depends on.

Monthly, sized to how much needs to move at once: $7k a month for one workflow in flight, $13k for one system built module by module, $18k and up for several modules at once. Bring us the idea and we'll tell you which tier and roughly how many months; that's your number. No change orders: whatever comes up goes into next week's release. Version one in your hands within the first month, you own the code from the first commit, three-month minimum.

One call to pick the workflow that hurts most. Then we build. By week three or four there's a version one running on your data, and from there the software drives the conversation: you use it, tell us what's wrong or missing, and we ship the fix that week. No scoping documents to read, nothing to approve on paper.

It goes into next week's release. There's no scope to protect, so 'what about this?' is always yes. Capacity is the only boundary: a long backlog means we ship in order. If you want more speed, that's the next tier, your call, in writing, before anything changes.

The Small team tier: one workflow in flight at $7k a month, three-month minimum. That's enough to get one internal tool or one workflow to a working version one in the first month and keep shipping against it every week. We won't take a 'just throw something together' one-off; there's no path to ship something we'd put our name on that way. If your need is smaller than that, we'll tell you which no-code tool to use and stay in touch for when it stops fitting.

It's the same engagement. The team that built it keeps shipping: bug fixes, new features, and ops, in the same Slack channel, on the same monthly tier. Drop to a smaller tier when the backlog shrinks, or take a clean handover with documentation if you want it in-house. We don't lock you in.

Custom software development means building an application from scratch around your exact workflow, instead of configuring an off-the-shelf product to approximate it. You own the codebase, the data model, and every integration — nothing is rented, nothing is generic. It's the right call when your process is specific enough that no SaaS tool fits it cleanly.

Web apps, internal tools, SaaS products, enterprise custom software, integrations between systems, customer portals, admin dashboards, marketplaces, AI-native products. We build on well-supported frameworks your team can hire for, and we pick boring tools on purpose, because we have to maintain them.

We're a small senior team. Not a freelance marketplace, not an outsourced agency, not a 200-person consultancy. The people writing the code are the people on calls with you. Two or three engineers per project, depending on scope.

Most US software dev shops are either tiny freelance pools or large consultancies that staff projects with whoever's available. We're a small team with deep ownership — same engineers from the first call through ship and beyond. If that matters to you, we're a good fit.

Sometimes. We do an audit first — if the code is salvageable and the previous team is gone, we'll pick it up. If it's so tangled that a rewrite is faster, we'll tell you. We don't do hostage rescues for free, but we'll be honest about what we find.

Look at relevant shipped work, meet the engineers who will build your system, and check ownership and support terms. Ask what the first working release includes and how the team handles changes once you start using it.

You own the repository from the first commit. We document the system and agree account access and handover responsibilities, so your team can keep building on it. Third-party tools retain their own licenses.

Use an existing product when it fits the workflow and the cost makes sense. Custom software is worth considering when missing features, manual handoffs, or workarounds keep getting in the way. We assess what is worth keeping before recommending a build.

Not really. "Custom software solutions" is usually what agencies call the finished product; "custom software development" is the process that builds it. Either way you get one thing: a production application built around your exact workflow, not a template you configure and hope fits. We use both terms because buyers search both.

"Bespoke software" is the UK/European term for what we call custom software — a system built from scratch around your exact workflow, not a configured template. Same process, same pricing, same senior team either way. The difference from a large bespoke software development company: no account managers in between — the engineers on your first call build the system.